Crazy Market Thoughts — Wake Me Up When September Ends
NOTE: This commentary was published at The Metal Augmentor on October 1, 2009 at 7:20 AM EST. Apologies once again to the SILVERAXIS faithful for not posting recently. I do expect to post more often in the future but during extremely busy periods it’s only fair that I spend whatever time I have writing for the benefit of paying Metal Augmentor subscribers. Our subscription window is currently closed but will open again hopefully soon. In the meantime, we are putting together a mailing list to keep everyone up to date on developments. You can sign up for the mailing list at www.metalaugmentor.com.
Gold, silver and commodities moved higher on Wednesday on the back of confusing data about the current state of the “green shoots recovery”. Gold was able to handily regain the $1,000 handle in a clear sign that this level, at least on a microscopic scale, no longer represents a psychological bulwark. Oil also surmounted $70 once again after trading as low as $65 at the end of last week. The U.S. dollar fell, but not as much as one would have thought by looking at the gold, silver and oil charts.
The confusing data came in the form of conflicting reports that showed the U.S. economy is not performing as poorly as previously expected but may be performing more poorly than currently expected. First there was an upward revision of second quarter 2009 GDP to a final minus 0.7% from a preliminary minus 1.0%. Second, there was a report that unemployment actually fell in August in 60% of the metropolitan areas surveyed. Third, the Chicago Purchasing Managers Index fell to 46.1% for September from a perfectly neutral 50.0% reading in August, indicating contraction of business activity in the Chicago area. Fourth, another jobs report that indicated companies are firing fewer people (most likely because there are fewer people left to fire). Along with recent statements by wunderbanker Bernanke that the U.S. recession is likely to have ended sometime in the third quarter, the picture is pretty much complete. Unfortunately it looks like finger painting by a rowdy group of three year olds who aren’t very good at finger painting. Our interpretation is that everybody seems to be grabbing at straws in an attempt to be right — about something in general or anything in particular– after being so horribly wrong for so long.
The way we see it, much of the apparent economic improvement has been the result of temporary stabilizing effects from the various stimuli, rescues, bailouts and handouts of the past two years. Unlike some others, we don’t subscribe to the dogma that government intervention is always a bad idea — in this case it likely prevented (at least so far) a backslide of no less than 200 years in the socio-economic advancement of mankind.
We also cannot say with 100% certainty that things will be worse going forward than they would have been if the markets were left to reclaim equilibrium in true laissez faire fashion (and it should be noted that we are very much in favor of laissez faire). The reason for our uncertainty is simply that there are no convincing historical examples of laissez faire triumphing over the basest instincts of man, which are decidedly not laissez faire. If left to his own devices, man will not trade freely among his kind but instead simply take what he covets by force or trickery. We are speaking in general terms of course but we could put names to our argument as well: Madoff, Stanford, etc., you get the point. Besides, anybody who has observed unsupervised children on a playground should know that laissez faire capitalism occurs about as naturally as Marxism. Both require fundamental altruism in order to properly function and therefore have to be enforced at the point of a gun. We suspect that is why the United States was arguably one of the last bastions of it; Americans have a lot of guns. Meanwhile, China appears to have found a way for the two competing systems to co-exist. Yin and Yang. At peace for now.
What we can say with great confidence, however, is that the current imbroglio represents a chronic symptom of the terminal financial disease that must be eventually faced. In summary, parts of the world have amassed debt they cannot possibly hope to ever repay while other parts have saved and invested according to the mantra, “if you build it, they will come”. Under these conditions, all governments can hope to do is stretch the day of reckoning out a week or perhaps a few years. But debt and capital destruction are unavoidable, one way or another. The trick, of course, is figuring out which way and investing accordingly.
Case in point is the current confusion about the state of the local and global economy. It is altogether possible that the recent “improvements” — including some of the economic data released on Wednesday — are already in the rear view mirror. In other words, we might be in the waning stages of an “economic upturn” that lasted from perhaps May to September, to be followed by episode two of business and consumer entrenchment. Actually, it’s probably less like episode two and more like the second act of a tragedy with three more acts to go. We should all know by now that things don’t actually get better. The intervening “action” between the first and last acts is just embellished space-filler that cannot possibly alter the pre-ordained course of tragic events.
Which brings us back to gold, silver, commodities, stocks, currencies and other markets. We note with some trepidation that all of these markets are currently trading on similarly upbeat sentiment and positive expectations. Not popular at all for the moment is grim reality. We find this surprising given the events of the past couple of years. Certainly market participants should easily recognize fact from fiction by now. But they don’t, or rather won’t, because they think they are invincible. The common mental ailment they share with all tragic figures is hubris. So they focus, for example, on the possibility that the housing market may not fall another 30% instead of focusing on the probability that 30% of homes will remain 30% underwater indefinitely (don’t quote us on these figures, we are approximating for the sake of arithmetic rhythm). We can take virtually any piece of economic data out there and the odds are that the markets have cherry-picked the parts of it that don’t look absolutely horrific, especially when viewed in total isolation. Back up a few steps, however, and the big picture looks remarkably like Hell. We suppose it is the eternal optimism of homo sapiens that conveniently blinds us so successfully. What else but eternal optimism can explain the time many of us waste watching golf, tweeting, counting our good fortune and cursing our bad luck, all the while mortality lurking around every corner?
It turns out that just about the only market that consistently bases expectations on reality is the bond market. This is a boorish bunch, but more than that, its denizens are clearly not human. Our version of logic dictates they must therefore be aliens. In fact, if we had more time and worried less about our own mortality, we would stake out Bill Gross of PIMCO to snap pictures of him boarding a UFO for the daily commute home. With our luck, however, the National Inquirer would beat us to it. So, we are left pondering if this time it might truly be different. Could the aliens in the bond pits be wrong? Do tepid interest rates signal a monumental misreading of the economy or inflation? Unfortunately, answers may not be forthcoming without an alien abduction. Not of us but the aliens. To be followed by water boa . . . ahem . . . enhanced interrogation techniques. On second thought, that might not work. Because of the gills.
We’re near the end now, so please don’t get mad at us for wasting over 1000 words to explain our simple thesis that human beings are rarely right about the markets compared to aliens. You see, we had a good reason for wasting your time. Otherwise, you might not have believed us when we warned you to beware of aliens buying gold. You still might not believe us, but we will persist nonetheless.
Perhaps we might improve our credibility if we rephrase our thesis as “the end of the world is near when the smartest of the smart money is buying gold”? Heck, who knows, you might even put up with our strange ways indefinitely when we tell you there is a tool that can reveal the precise moment when the buying starts. It is called the gold and silver basis and we will do all the work to figure it out. All you have to do is think long and hard enough to realize we are right, and then act when the time comes.
Alas, the gold and silver basis are not telling us anything smart about the smart money at this precise moment. Absent that, we’d just as well listen to something dumb about the smart money, and do the opposite. Please stay tuned*.
*Only loyal Metal Augmentor subscribers are being provided with the special headsets, constructed from slightly radioactive paper clips held together with pre-owned chewing gum, that can receive and download our timely updates on the gold and silver basis. We hope to soon make these headsets available to a limited number of additional homo sapiens. If you are an alien, don’t bother, we use special polarized sunglasses that will identify you. Headsets are compatible with sunglasses but may or may not work with tinfoil hats.
good to see youve landed tom.welcome back to earth
chris w
Tom very creative and informative post. It is also nice to see the SILVERAXIS PUBLIC BLOG up and running again. In appreciate of the reopening of the public blog, I will stay the course on GOLD, SILVER and the ECONOMY.
Tom mentions that the BOND MARKET is the one market that is has expectations consistently based in reality. He states whether or not BILL GROSS of PIMCO could be an ALIEN. Not only is this a comical explanation of the current system, Tom does not realize how SPOT ON he is in his DIAGNOSIS. Thing only change I would make is the choice of his ALIEN. It is not BILL GROSS, but the US FED who is the ALIEN in disguise. The reason for the PRESENT BULL in the BOND MARKET is due to the fact that FOREIGN CENTRAL BANKS are dumping their worthless MORTGAGE BONDS, taking the DOLLARS and buying US TREASURIES. What we have is the MONETIZATION of TREASURIES by the US FED. I agree with JIM WILLIE, the US FED is buying upwards of 60-80% of the US TREASURIES. This is not something that will go on for long……a US TREASURY DEFAULT is coming.
The long standing debate of whether the US GOVT has been MANIPULATING GOLD has come to an end ZERO HEDGE through the freedom of information act has provided the public with evidence of US GOVT-FED manipulation of GOLD going back to Arthur Burns the Fed Chairman in 1975. You can read all about it here:
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/smoking-gun-fed-controlling-gold
You can also here about this from the GATA interview by ERIC KING here:
http://www.kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast_Gold+/Entries/2009/10/2_GATA.html
Today, the markets are nothing more than a CIRCUS. I have to agree again with JIM WILLIE on this issue. Nothing has changed since the US BANKING SYSTEM had a HEART ATTACK last year. Basically the US FED and its member SYNDICATES (JP MORGAN & GOLDMAN) have pressed the accelerator of PONZI FINANCE to keep the DEAD ZOMBIE economy alive a little longer as they STEAL the AMERICAN PUBLIC BLIND. The FED keeps adding more TOXIC GARBAGE to its balance sheet and the SYNDICATES swindle $BILLIONS to OFFSHORE BANKS.
JP MORGAN continues is MANIPULATION of interest rates with the highest notional amount of INTEREST RATE DERIVATIVES on the PLANET. CHINA was included in this SCHEME back in the early 2000’s to be the BIG SILVER SHORT as they had the largest SILVER SMELTING OPERATION in the world. This worked find until about a MONTH ago…when the CHINESE decided to pull the plug on its COMMODITY DERIVATIVES. This just might leave JP MORGAN holding the large SILVER SHORTS.
The DEATH of the US DOLLAR is underway. It will not happen gradually. We must remember, the US DOLLAR has been dieing since 1971 (the disease started in 1913). If we could take a satellite picture of the USS TITANIC when it was hit by an ICEBERG we would notice for quite a while the GREAT SHIP was still afloat. Imagine if a picture was taken every minute and make that minute equal a week in these present markets. The TITANIC sunk in 2 hours 40 minutes. This would be about 160 minutes or the equivalent of 3 years in my example. Now….each minute or each week we see another picture of the TITANIC (US DOLLAR). Even though the TITANIC takes on water, from space we still see the WHOLE SHIP above water. Three years go by in our present markets and we still see the TITANIC and the US DOLLAR. Then all of a sudden, the next picture we see an EMPTY SEA…the TITANIC is gone….and so will the US DOLLAR. It will happen overnight.
GOLD and SILVER will be some of the BEST STORES of WEALTH when the US DOLLAR and US EMPIRE COLLAPSES. The US LEADERS are not making changes to benefit the public….this will turn THE UNITED STATES into a THIRD WORLD COUNTRY. I wish I could be more OPTOMISTIC…..but the GREAT AMERICAN PONZI FINANCE SYSTEM is coming to an end.
I await for the GOLD and SILVER BASIS as proof that the END IS NEAR.
No, government intervention has not “prevented” anything. Instead, it is the very cause of all of the trauma. Delaying disaster for another day or so is not prevention, but merely a head-in-the-sand approach that actually increases the size of the problem. Every single “thing” being done is a market distortion of what individuals would’ve otherwise freely done with their own wealth, lowering the standards of living for all.
You are falling for Bastiat’s broken-window fallacy, focusing only on the seen, while ignoring the unseen. Just as the Dark Ages were not avoidable in the past, due to the consumption of capital that is government spending, they will not be avoided in this case either, as digital coin-clipping is no better than its predecessor.
Instead of arguing with you about it though (as I’m no expert), I’d direct you to Murray Rothbard’s Man, Economy & State with Power and Market.
I finished this book just this morning, and quite honestly, it makes ALL of your arguments appear immature and incoherent.
Or as I like to call it, apathetic, wishful thinking.
I do find it humorous though Tom, that SRSrocco is always talking about Jim Willie here on these threads, as his views, while being a primary source for your ridicule (given his hyperbole), are a far more accurate view of the political space, IMO.
It seems that you are doomed to fail, unless you stop this madness known as faith in government. They are all either criminals, tools, fools, or some mixture of the three. Like all parasites, they serve only those who empower them at the expense of all others.
To put your faith in this violent gangsterism, is to apathetically usher in your worst nightmares, all in the name of TINA. (there is no alternative)
You can parrot conventional wisdom all you want, but it won’t save you. Rothbard’s book however, just might.
@(8?»
I agree with you post…and yes I do write alot of what JIM WILLIE states…but hey…I always give him the CREDIT. I have his subscription…and if I did not give him a great deal of the CREDIT…let me REPEAT…JIM WILLIE has opened my eyes. I think the man is a GENIUS when it comes to the present ECONOMY and GEO-POLITICAL SYSTEM.
That being said….it is just a MATTER OF TIME before the US DOLLAR is OVER and the US EMPIRE. Those DELUDED between both parties will be caught like a DEER in the HEAD LIGHTS. It is more than GOLD and SILVER, it is a matter of SURVIVAL. I also quote JAMES KUNSTLER if you should know….and MATT SIMMONS….and JIM SINCLAIR.
@(8?»
I considered and threw away Rothbardian libertarianism a while ago after realizing that it is as naive as the opposite (Marxism). I fully agree that governments are at best inept and should never be the first answer, but often they are the only thing that will work and therefore can be a valid last answer. This is an argument for a middle ground instead of Rothbard who says government can never do any good, ever.
Funny you should mention Dark Ages because that was actually a classic period of libertarianism with very little government “intervention”. As a result, “private” interests such as barbarian hoards, the organized church and the noble class were able to exert violence that was quite effective in subverting humankind. The opposite of course is what got us the systematic violence of the 19th and 20th centuries. So here is the formula:
Government monopoly = systematic massacre
Private monopoly = capricious, pointless massacre
Perhaps the answer lies in not giving anybody a total monopoly on power, and that includes the individual?
Interestingly, it was the rise of nations and groups identifying along the lines of government that coincided with enlightenment and advancement throughout history. Ancient Rome, Greece, Islamic and other empires were “governments” in every sense and yet they coincided with periods of learning and advancement. Conversely, the barbarians, who were the ultimate libertarians (anarchists), brought us nothing.
This is not an argument for bigger government, but it is an argument for some type of government. Bottom line, I don’t place my “faith” in government, but I also don’t place my “faith” in the judgment of individuals, especially when they congregate. A mob is as likely to string someone up, if not more so. Moreover, you can’t EVER reason with a mob.
Regarding Jim Willie, his arguments seem prophetic only because they are on the correct side of the equation — decline of U.S dollar, ascent of the Third World, commodities are good, paper is bad. I don’t disagree with any of these in the generic sense and indeed it would be foolish to do so. What I disagree with is the extent and timing. If you look at his specific geo-political predictions, his accuracy is inversely proportional to how radical the prediction is.
Finally, Rothbard was a prolific thinker, and he certainly had an answer to everything. That doesn’t mean he had answers to all the relevant questions or that they were always the right answers. Always being right is impossible when you start with any dogmatic position. Moreover, his philosophical foundation was based on assertions that are for the most part unprovable. The problem with Rothbard, as with Marx, is that he pretty much ignored the entirety of human history and chose instead to operate in a vacuum of idealism. This doesn’t make him necessarily wrong, but it doesn’t make him absolutely right either. To claim that the current problems in the U.S. are solely the fault of government is as silly as claiming that it is the fault of the Europeans who took the land by force from the Native Americans. After all, we wouldn’t be in this mess today if the Native Americans were still in charge! Ironically, Rothbard’s theory is consistent with taking the Native American’s land since they did not view it as private property. Ergo, the current mess is really Rothbard’s fault!
we used to have this thing called the U.S. constitution which sought to find a middle ground between limited government and individual freedom.
But now all we have is an out of control government monster that is devouring everything from individual rights to public health and wealth. It is completely corrupt (virtually every single politician is “owned”), deceptive, out of contact with the people’s needs and totally self serving to those on the inside. What good can come of that for us?