Home > Windbag Wisdom > Houston, We May Have a Problem

Houston, We May Have a Problem

March 2nd, 2009

The silver and gold rockets appear to have misfired a bit after a very promising setup that appeared around January 22, 2009. It looks like we are about to test the $12.50 and $900 levels in the next coupleĀ  of days and price action around there should tell us quite a bit about how controllable the flare-ups are on board the PM rockets.

I have previously laid out the scenario that the launch sequence wasn’t going to be very safe — that investment demand wasn’t very widespread, that speculators had returned to gold in significant numbers, that no true capitulation had yet occurred despite gold falling below $700 last October, that gold timers and analysts were being complacent, that Jim Cramer has just pounded the table for his disciples to buy gold, that the dollar would keep rising, that U.S. Treasury prices wouldn’t collapse, that oil and commodities would continue to weaken, that the stock and credit markets would enter another liquidation phase, etc. Despite all this, silver and gold are actually holding up relatively well and I think there is an even chance that they will find support near the aforementioned price levels. This is quite incredible if you think about it — the number of conventional factors aligned against the monetary metals, gold in particular, are massive and yet gold remains within 10% of its all-time highs. The result is both risks and opportunities.

The odds that the monetary metals quickly head back to their October lows remain slim but discreet. I continue to believe that put options in gold futures and perhaps GLD have the best risk-reward profile. These are not outright bearish bets but rather attempts to catch a falling knife as gold prices first slice to extreme lows and then immediately recover to some interim level perhaps around $800. I’ve described this strategy to subscribers at Metal Augmentor. Adding significant new long positions whether they be in the metals or mining stocks remains too risky for most portfolios and outright leverage should be avoided entirely.

The main danger signal right now is that the short-term investment case for silver could form some serious cracks in the days ahead. Already the Barclays ETF, SLV, has liquidated around 4 million ounces of silver and this occurred against a backdrop of ETF premiums merely returning to par. This was not likely due to selling pressure but rather a small decrease in buying pressure. Should we see selling pressure develop, it will be evident in the “ETF Basis” figures that I track at Metal Augmentor. At that point, the risk of the ETF liquidating a large amount of silver accompanied by $1+ daily drops in the silver price will increase substantially. As I write this, there is scant evidence of such selling pressure. The ETF Basis for SLV has, however, returned pretty much to par as I mentioned above. Since January 21 at least, SLV has traded at a premium to its net asset value (the underlying silver), which was an indication of very strong investment demand. At a minimum, investors are taking a rest.

Backwardation is also disappearing in LBMA silver — today’s level is essentially equivalent to par (neither contango nor backwardation). Keeping an eye on this figure, which everybody can do here and here, is advisable in the days and weeks ahead for buyers, sellers, traders and speculators.

Investment demand for gold has backed off as well, but a slight “backwardation” remains in the gold ETF GLD. Consequently, no metal has been liquidated by GLD although new additions have stopped. It is probably more important to watch what happens with the gold basis in the days ahead compared to silver because gold has been the undisputed sentiment leader. Given market conditions, even a moderate change in investment sentiment toward gold could result in very significant price fluctuations.

While everybody is looking the other way, the dollar appears ready to break out with a minimum target of 95 on the dollar index and possibly 100. Don’t believe the claptrap that gold has permanently decoupled from the dollar — this is an illusion created by the vigorous buying of gold in countries where the financial situation is even more dire than the U.S. Such buying may slow down at some point and if the dollar is near 100 at that point then gold has serious downside exposure in dollar terms.

Today’s drop in the stock markets was cold and vicious; the gains of the late 1990s bull market are now being handed back. The S&P 500 (a much better measure than the Dow) is now trading at late 1996 levels after having fallen 56% from its peak. At some point it will bounce violently and this could place significant pressure on silver and gold prices because such bounce is unlikely to be due to expectations of near-term hyperinflation. A 30-50% rally in the stock markets along with the dollar index trading near 100 could create significant headwinds for the monetary metals, at least for a few months.

Even if things play out as I generally outlined above, gold and silver in the longer term cannot help but be among the best stores of value. Either we get a deflationary, civilization stunting monetary collapse or we get a hyperinflationary melt up. Those are the only two choices. The timing might extend further than the 6-18 months I predicted last October but probably not by much. Therefore, I would recommend against being caught without a protective shield of monetary metals even as they ride a roller coaster to their fate.

silverax Windbag Wisdom

  1. dieuwer
    March 2nd, 2009 at 17:50 | #1

    Me thinks the dolar index is overrated, it basically is a fancy inverse-euro-index.
    So the dollar index may go up to 100… perhaps. But more correctly would be that the “euro-index” (1/USD) is going down the drain.

    Just for fun, graph the price of gold in Zimbabwe dollars per ounce. It probably looks VERY parabolic. Does that mean you should sell when you live in Zimbabwe?

    Regarding Jim C. and his disciples: sure they SAY buy gold, but DO they actually DO that? Stop listening, starting watching their actions.

    • mike
      March 2nd, 2009 at 20:29 | #2

      Don’t listen to the media , just do what you think is right . They control the media …Bloomberg, CNBC, WSJ etc..they can brain wash the public. They control the rating agencies , they can down grade Asia and Europe but will never downgrade USA..

    • silverax
      March 4th, 2009 at 13:44 | #3

      The dollar index considers only the major currencies as it should, stuff like Zimbabwe dollars or Hungarian forints are totally irrelevant in this case.

  2. Kipling
    March 2nd, 2009 at 21:46 | #4

    Meanwhile, gold in Canadian dollars is sitting at 1199 as I write and looking strong with ironclad support at this level. The kilos I bought for 30.5 in September are now @ 38.5. At the time, I bought a Buffalo at my local coin shop for $1235 CDN. Kilos are where the Chinese action is, the one oz round premiums are too much. The Buffalo is a beautiful luxury, if you can find it. There is no supply and the premiums are huge. I’m calling this handle the bottom right here and now. Why? Because it feels hard to buy. Make the hard trade.

  3. forwill
    March 2nd, 2009 at 21:51 | #5

    The towel still hasn’t been thrown in in the major equity indexes. A surrender down to the DJIA 5500-5000 area looks very possible. As share prices plummet and earnings falter, the P/E ratios keep going higher and higher. Who has the cajones to enter with such dismal fundamentals when P/E ratios are 30,40 or 50? I don’t!
    In October, I never saw what I would consider capitulation in Gold either…either the long term bull is the real deal or we’re in for a shellacking that could take a few years(instead of months) to recover from.
    Unfortunately, the gold price in dollar terms is a big part of what drives the “speculative investor” and the relatively new ETFs allow them to get out as quickly as they got in.

    • silverax
      March 4th, 2009 at 13:48 | #6

      Agree there could be downside in equities but very possible that a major dead cat bounce is just ahead.

      I don’t believe gold would take years to recover but it could take a while to stabilize near the $800 level. There are just too many fundamental reasons to buy gold right now and if one group of investors stops buying there is likely to be another group to pick it up, especially at lower prices. For example, Indian buyers will eventually come back to the market, probably just as ETF buyers have their plates full.

      The big issue with the ETFs is that until recently they weren’t that big. But now even a modest amount of selling of say 10% of holdings could put major pressure on the spot market if the selling happens at the wrong time. The net result I believe is more future volatility.

  4. forwill
    March 2nd, 2009 at 22:42 | #7

    OK, I know I say some stupid crap. I’m not the sharpest tool in the shed(some say I’m just a tool) but I learn quick ;>). Does this S+P 500 P/E chart have any valuable meaning?

    • PauPer
      March 3rd, 2009 at 08:12 | #8

      I like the inverse correlation with the 1980 metal spike
      but I’m not selling “at any price” if the payment is S&P shares.

      if you want more if these ‘tools’ in your shed…
      did you see the Metal Augmentor post & spreadsheet on gold ratios?

      The following analysis is only relevant to you if you believe that gold has some price or value in relation to the financial world and that it is worthwhile to examine this relationship periodically to determine if gold is possibly under priced, fairly priced, or over priced.
      http://metalaugmentor.com/eforum/?p=126

    • forwill
      March 3rd, 2009 at 20:34 | #9

      Thanks much Pauper

  5. forwill
    • silverax
      March 4th, 2009 at 13:51 | #11

      It is dangerous to assume that indicators like PE ratios have to way overshoot the mean as they revert back from extreme levels. This is often the case but not always depending on fickle investor mass sentiment. If the general public ends up disgusted with stocks as a result of the current bear market, we could get to PE ratios near 10 or even under, but otherwise it is not likely.

  6. forwill
    March 3rd, 2009 at 20:30 | #12

    I know you can’t look at P/E ratios in a vacuum, but if terrible auto sales are any indication of folks unwillingness to spend, first quarter earnings are sure to fall. This will cause another selloff in a worried market that wants to see single digit ratios. Some household name companies….
    WMT 13.85
    PM 9.74
    INTC 13.35
    PG 12.47
    PEP 15.10
    PFE 9.97
    A bear market rally where cash comes out of the woodwork, may indeed be months away.

    Here’s some companies in our sphere of interest. Justified?
    SLW 87.00
    ABX 31.90
    KGC 39.92
    GOLD 64.82

    • showmetheway09
      March 3rd, 2009 at 21:23 | #13

      Forwill, you sound like a car’s sales man…please refrain or keep your investment advise to yourself

    • PauPer
      March 4th, 2009 at 10:56 | #14

      what if the dollar is at 89 when you buy, but only at 75 when they earn?
      how about determining P/Es in gold grams???

      looks to me like forwill asked a question:
      >>If ….. Justified?<<
      I didnt see any advice.
      wow, ask to be showntheway, then cover your ears.
      opinions move markets & since this is the public blog
      please post away, Im trying to learn all I can

    • silverax
      March 4th, 2009 at 13:58 | #15

      forwill, I understand the point — many staple equities are sporting reasonable PE ratios while a number of gold and silver stocks have very high PE ratios. This is a valid point, and I think it does speak to having a balanced view of the markets. I do agree that short term the general equities are vulnerable but at some point they should benefit from some risk money coming back to play. At the same time, I don’t necessarily believe gold and silver mining stock trailing PE ratios are the way to analyze them. Instead, one should look at a reasonable long term average metal price and extrapolate PE from that. On that basis, one could argue somewhat convincingly that a number of mining stocks are overpriced.

      showmetheway09, I think you misunderstood a valid point that forwill was trying to make.

      PauPer, PE ratios for mining stocks in gold is an interesting idea I have tried to calculate in the past, might try again if I get a chance. Didn’t get the results I was hoping for the first time, could be different now.

    • forwill
      March 4th, 2009 at 20:03 | #16

      Showme, a little too wordy, yes. If I give any advice it’d be best to do the opposite.
      Good point Pauper, preserving and growing buying power, not dollars, is why I keep reading here.
      Yeah Tom, trailing info is kinda useless unless you wan’t to get in or out late like the Cramer types do so often.

Comments are closed.